CSS
38 files, and the language that carries the estate's alignment discipline further than any other. Everything below was reconstructed by counting: there is not one documented CSS rule anywhere.
1. The complete example
components/sg-compute/sg-compute-left-nav/v0/v0.1/v0.1.0/sg-compute-left-nav.cssexcerpt · 03__html-and-css.md:host { display: flex; flex-direction: column; height: 100%; overflow: hidden; }
[hidden] { display: none !important; }
.left-nav {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: stretch;
padding: 6px 0;
height: 100%;
background: var(--bg-panel);
border-right: 1px solid var(--border-1);
gap: 2px;
}
.nav-item {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
gap: 3px;
padding: 10px 0;
background: transparent;Apache-2.0 — quoted from the estate's own source, not covered by this site's CC BY 4.0. Counted 2026-08-24.
2. Alignment, per block
Property values are aligned to a column within each rule — exactly the discipline
applied to Python attribute annotations and JavaScript object keys. In the example above,
.left-nav and .nav-item align at different columns, each set by
its own longest property name.
The unit of alignment is the block, not the file.
That detail is what makes the convention survivable. If the column were file-wide, adding one long property name anywhere would reformat the whole file and produce a diff nobody can read. Per-block, the blast radius of a rename is the block you were editing anyway.
The argument for doing this at all — that it is a machine-readability decision rather than an
aesthetic one, in a codebase 61% written by an agent — is made in full on
the house style page, along with the honest note that
it is a claim rather than a measured finding. No formatter in the industry will produce
this, so adopting it means never adopting prettier. That is a real and permanent
cost. Q1 →
3. The other conventions in that file
:hostfirst, as a single line, establishing the component's own box.[hidden] { display: none !important; }as a standing reset. The!importantis deliberate:display: flexon:hostwould otherwise beat the attribute, and a hidden component would render.- Flexbox for layout, with
gaprather than margins. - Every colour and surface is a token. No literal hex values in component CSS, ever.
- Class names are plain and semantic —
.left-nav,.nav-item,.nav-icon. Not BEM, not utility classes.
Why not BEM
BEM exists to solve a problem shadow DOM removes.
BEM, utility classes and every other naming scheme that encodes structure into a class name exist because global stylesheets leak. Inside a shadow root the styles cannot leak, so they do not need namespacing, and a naming convention that fights the cascade is a cost you only pay if your styles are global. Dropping it is not sloppiness — it is declining to pay for a problem you no longer have.
4. Design tokens
Tokens come from the versioned CDN and are adopted per component:
components/…/sg-compute-left-nav.jsone line, from the component's JS · 03__html-and-css.mdget sharedCssPaths() { return ['https://dev.tools.sgraph.ai/components/tokens/v1/v1.0/v1.0.0/sg-tokens.css'] }Apache-2.0 — quoted from the estate's own source, not covered by this site's CC BY 4.0. Counted 2026-08-24.
Two things about the token system are worth copying, and one is worth fixing.
The good part: bounded numbered ramps. --text-1 through
--text-4, --sg-sp-1 through --sg-sp-4,
--shadow-1 and --shadow-2. A bounded ramp rather than arbitrary values
means there is a right answer to “which grey?” and a small number of wrong ones. This site's own
stylesheet uses the same shape.
The part to fix: three prefixes for one token system.
| Family | Examples |
|---|---|
| Unprefixed | --bg-panel, --border-1, --text-1 … --text-4, --text-link, --shadow-1, --warn, --soon |
--sg- | --sg-text, --sg-text-muted, --sg-surface, --sg-sp-1 … --sg-sp-4, --sg-transition-fast |
--sgl- | --sgl-tab-h, --sgl-panel-h |
Pick one prefix, or document what each family means. Either is fine; having three and no explanation is not. Q3 →
5. Theming
The token indirection is what makes theming possible at all: components reference
var(--bg-panel) and never a literal, so a theme is a different
sg-tokens.css at a different version path.
Unverified. The token names suggest a dark-first palette, and the survey behind this page could not confirm that a second theme file exists. The mechanism is clearly there; whether it has ever been used twice is not established, and this page does not claim it has. Tracked as a loose end →
6. The one rule that would catch defects
Formatting rules are cheap and mostly cosmetic. There is one CSS rule here that would catch
real bugs: no literal colours outside the token file. A single hard-coded
#fff in a component stylesheet is invisible in review, survives every refactor, and
breaks the day somebody ships a second theme.
The stylelint config →